링크 감사합니다. 다봤지만, 저는 UFO가 외계존재를 증명하는지 전혀 convinced되지 않는군요. 대부분 비행기 운전하신 아저씨들의 회고담들이구요. 뒷부분도 봐야겠지만, 저는 황당하기만 합니다. 아직 천문학자들의 증언이나 과학적 논의를 한 사람도 없습니다.
The Condon Report를 주목할 필요가 있구요. 1968년에 출판되었지만, 당시의 UFO 현상에 대한 콜로라도 대학으 칸돈교수팀의 보고서입니다. 아래 링크는 이 보고서의 오리지날입니다. http://condon.ncas.org/text/contents.htm 다음의 내용은 연구 과정을 설명한 것이구요.
The Condon Committee was the informal name of the University of Colorado UFO Project, a study of unidentified flying objects, undertaken at the University of Colorado from 1966 to 1968 under the direction of physicist Edward Condon. The Condon Committee was instigated at the behest of the United States Air Force, which had studied UFOs since the 1940s. After examining many hundreds of UFO files from the Air Force’s Project Blue Book and from civilian UFO groups NICAP and APRO, the Committee selected 56 to analyze in detail for the purpose of deciding whether "analysis of new sightings may provide some additions to scientific knowledge of value to the Air Force"[1] and "to learn from UFO reports anything that could be considered as adding to scientific knowledge". This final report (Formally titled Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects but commonly called the Condon Report) was published in 1968. Arguing that the study of UFOs was unlikely to yield major scientific discoveries, the report also suggested that "persons with good ideas for specific studies in this field should be supported" by Federal government agencies on a case by case basis. In particular, the Committee noted that there were gaps in scientific knowledge in the fields of "atmospheric optics, including radio wave propagation, and of atmospheric electricity" that might benefit from further research in the UFO field. The Report was reviewed by a panel of the National Academy of Sciences, which endorsed its scope, conclusions and recommendations.[3] The Report’s conclusions were generally welcomed by the scientific community, and have been cited as a decisive factor in the generally low levels of interest regarding UFOs among academics in subsequent years. Peter Sturrock writes that the report is "the most influential public document concerning the scientific status of this [UFO] problem. Hence, all current scientific work on the UFO problem must make reference to the Condon Report."[4] However, the report has faced much criticism as to its methodology and bias, from both investigators who worked on the project and others.
아래 인용구는 UFOlogy는 과학적 지식에 보태지지 않는다는 것이구요. "“… nothing has come from the study of UFOs in the past 21 years that has added to scientific knowledge. Careful consideration of the record as it is available to us leads us to conclude that further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby.” 이 보고서를 비과학적 연구결과물이라고 UFOlogists들에 의하여 비판받고 있습니다.
아래 책은 2003년 캘리포니아 대학 출판사에서 2003년에 출판한 것으로 UFOlogy를 미국의 하위문화현상의 일부로 보고 있습니다. 저도 그렇게 생각합니다. 아직 주류 과학계에서 인정받고 있지 않은 UFOlogy에 근
The Condon Report를 주목할 필요가 있구요. 1968년에 출판되었지만, 당시의 UFO 현상에 대한 콜로라도 대학으 칸돈교수팀의 보고서입니다. 아래 링크는 이 보고서의 오리지날입니다.
http://condon.ncas.org/text/contents.htm
다음의 내용은 연구 과정을 설명한 것이구요.
The Condon Committee was the informal name of the University of Colorado UFO Project, a study of unidentified flying objects, undertaken at the University of Colorado from 1966 to 1968 under the direction of physicist Edward Condon. The Condon Committee was instigated at the behest of the United States Air Force, which had studied UFOs since the 1940s. After examining many hundreds of UFO files from the Air Force’s Project Blue Book and from civilian UFO groups NICAP and APRO, the Committee selected 56 to analyze in detail for the purpose of deciding whether "analysis of new sightings may provide some additions to scientific knowledge of value to the Air Force"[1] and "to learn from UFO reports anything that could be considered as adding to scientific knowledge". This final report (Formally titled Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects but commonly called the Condon Report) was published in 1968. Arguing that the study of UFOs was unlikely to yield major scientific discoveries, the report also suggested that "persons with good ideas for specific studies in this field should be supported" by Federal government agencies on a case by case basis. In particular, the Committee noted that there were gaps in scientific knowledge in the fields of "atmospheric optics, including radio wave propagation, and of atmospheric electricity" that might benefit from further research in the UFO field. The Report was reviewed by a panel of the National Academy of Sciences, which endorsed its scope, conclusions and recommendations.[3] The Report’s conclusions were generally welcomed by the scientific community, and have been cited as a decisive factor in the generally low levels of interest regarding UFOs among academics in subsequent years. Peter Sturrock writes that the report is "the most influential public document concerning the scientific status of this [UFO] problem. Hence, all current scientific work on the UFO problem must make reference to the Condon Report."[4] However, the report has faced much criticism as to its methodology and bias, from both investigators who worked on the project and others.
아래 인용구는 UFOlogy는 과학적 지식에 보태지지 않는다는 것이구요.
"“… nothing has come from the study of UFOs in the past 21 years that has added to scientific knowledge. Careful consideration of the record as it is available to us leads us to conclude that further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby.”
이 보고서를 비과학적 연구결과물이라고 UFOlogists들에 의하여 비판받고 있습니다.
아래 책은 2003년 캘리포니아 대학 출판사에서 2003년에 출판한 것으로 UFOlogy를 미국의 하위문화현상의 일부로 보고 있습니다. 저도 그렇게 생각합니다. 아직 주류 과학계에서 인정받고 있지 않은 UFOlogy에 근